More shameless self publicity. This is one of our Luther King House Church Saturdays. I think the flyer's self explanatory. If you're in the Manchester area, why not come and join us? Click on the image below to mail us with your booking.
Friday, 22 October 2010
Thursday, 21 October 2010
The Minister As Missionary 2
Introduction - Missionary by Orientation
Talk of mission is fast becoming the twenty-first century ecclesiastical equivalent of bind weed. It gets everywhere. Nor is it just talk about mission that is expanding, our understanding of what qualifies as mission has grown and grown and grown. So much so that we run the risk of sticking the label “missionary” on everything that moves and, this being church, quite few things that have long since lost the power of movement.
On the one hand, this is clearly a good thing. I wouldn’t want to go back to the idea that unless it involves giving out tracts or making an appeal it doesn’t count as mission. On the other hand though, there is a problem. What exactly does count as mission and what ought not to count? Where do we draw the line? Which activities qualify?
I do an exercise with our students called Is it mission? They conduct a questionnaire with their congregation. The questionnaire lists a range of activities – everything from church planting through political campaigning to discussing religion with a Hindu neighbour. The interviewees have to decide which activities qualify as mission. We soon discover that if you try hard enough you can make a case for virtually anything to count as mission.
The problem of course lies in our attempt to define mission in terms of what we do. Becoming missional is not about doing a different thing, a new thing, an additional thing, it’s about doing all that we do with a different view in mind. Mission is not one thing in particular it is everything seen from a particular perspective. In the end I don’t think it’s helpful to think about which activities count and which don’t. Our focus should be on our orientation. Not “What are we doing?” but, “What is our motivation?” Not, “What is occupying us?” but, “What are we intending?” Is our concern, the furthering of God’s purposes for the world? Then in my book it’s mission.
To get theological for a moment, it’s a matter of learning to see our place in the grand flow of the divine purpose, the Genesis to Revelation movement of God. Creation itself is an act of mission, an act of divine outreach, bringing into being that which is both other than God and beloved by God. Similarly, God’s determined commitment to the world despite its sin and brokenness is the missionary ground of the reality in which we live. And of course the vision of the consummation of all things when the kingdom of this world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Messiah is our missiological lodestar.
The people of God have their being and find their identity as part of this reality. We exist for God and for God’s ultimate purpose, the restoration of all things. To the extent that Christians live contrary to this reality, pursuing self-interest and neglecting the divine project, we live against the grain of reality and in denial of our identity. We also live in contradiction of the very heart of the gospel. Whether you look to the incarnation, ministry or crucifixion of Christ what you see is the most profound orientation to the other, a living and a dying for the sake of the world, a radical refusal of self-absorption.
If you want an illustration of my point consider the second of this year’s televised prime-ministerial debates. Supposedly this focused on foreign policy. The questions however were all about national self-interest. Nothing on international justice, nothing on the global poor, nothing on international development. Little-Englandism at its worst. And the kind of attitude that is sadly too often found, transposed into a religious key, within our churches.
If all the talking, writing, conferencing, posturing and assembling on the theme of mission is to amount to anything, then we need a radical reorientation of the life of our churches. And if our churches are to experience this reorientation then our concept of ministry also needs a shake up. If we are to nurture genuinely missionary disciples, and genuinely missionary congregations we have to have genuinely missionary ministers, ministers who are oriented towards the beyond church, who see their calling as helping God’s church prayerfully to pursue God’s purpose for God’s world.
Back in May I gave the Baptist Ministers' Fellowship annual lecture at the Baptist Assembly in Plymouth. This month a version of the talk was published in the Baptist Minsters' Journal. With the kind permission of the editorial board I will be reproducing a slightly modified version of the BMJ article here. To keep things down to regular post length I'm going to stick it up in a series of bite size chunks.
Talk of mission is fast becoming the twenty-first century ecclesiastical equivalent of bind weed. It gets everywhere. Nor is it just talk about mission that is expanding, our understanding of what qualifies as mission has grown and grown and grown. So much so that we run the risk of sticking the label “missionary” on everything that moves and, this being church, quite few things that have long since lost the power of movement.
On the one hand, this is clearly a good thing. I wouldn’t want to go back to the idea that unless it involves giving out tracts or making an appeal it doesn’t count as mission. On the other hand though, there is a problem. What exactly does count as mission and what ought not to count? Where do we draw the line? Which activities qualify?
I do an exercise with our students called Is it mission? They conduct a questionnaire with their congregation. The questionnaire lists a range of activities – everything from church planting through political campaigning to discussing religion with a Hindu neighbour. The interviewees have to decide which activities qualify as mission. We soon discover that if you try hard enough you can make a case for virtually anything to count as mission.
The problem of course lies in our attempt to define mission in terms of what we do. Becoming missional is not about doing a different thing, a new thing, an additional thing, it’s about doing all that we do with a different view in mind. Mission is not one thing in particular it is everything seen from a particular perspective. In the end I don’t think it’s helpful to think about which activities count and which don’t. Our focus should be on our orientation. Not “What are we doing?” but, “What is our motivation?” Not, “What is occupying us?” but, “What are we intending?” Is our concern, the furthering of God’s purposes for the world? Then in my book it’s mission.
To get theological for a moment, it’s a matter of learning to see our place in the grand flow of the divine purpose, the Genesis to Revelation movement of God. Creation itself is an act of mission, an act of divine outreach, bringing into being that which is both other than God and beloved by God. Similarly, God’s determined commitment to the world despite its sin and brokenness is the missionary ground of the reality in which we live. And of course the vision of the consummation of all things when the kingdom of this world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Messiah is our missiological lodestar.
The people of God have their being and find their identity as part of this reality. We exist for God and for God’s ultimate purpose, the restoration of all things. To the extent that Christians live contrary to this reality, pursuing self-interest and neglecting the divine project, we live against the grain of reality and in denial of our identity. We also live in contradiction of the very heart of the gospel. Whether you look to the incarnation, ministry or crucifixion of Christ what you see is the most profound orientation to the other, a living and a dying for the sake of the world, a radical refusal of self-absorption.
If you want an illustration of my point consider the second of this year’s televised prime-ministerial debates. Supposedly this focused on foreign policy. The questions however were all about national self-interest. Nothing on international justice, nothing on the global poor, nothing on international development. Little-Englandism at its worst. And the kind of attitude that is sadly too often found, transposed into a religious key, within our churches.
If all the talking, writing, conferencing, posturing and assembling on the theme of mission is to amount to anything, then we need a radical reorientation of the life of our churches. And if our churches are to experience this reorientation then our concept of ministry also needs a shake up. If we are to nurture genuinely missionary disciples, and genuinely missionary congregations we have to have genuinely missionary ministers, ministers who are oriented towards the beyond church, who see their calling as helping God’s church prayerfully to pursue God’s purpose for God’s world.
Back in May I gave the Baptist Ministers' Fellowship annual lecture at the Baptist Assembly in Plymouth. This month a version of the talk was published in the Baptist Minsters' Journal. With the kind permission of the editorial board I will be reproducing a slightly modified version of the BMJ article here. To keep things down to regular post length I'm going to stick it up in a series of bite size chunks.
Wednesday, 20 October 2010
The Minister As Missionary 1
Back in May I gave the Baptist Ministers' Fellowship annual lecture at the Baptist Assembly in Plymouth. This month a version of the talk was published in the Baptist Minsters' Journal. With the kind permission of the editorial board I will be reproducing the BMJ article here. To keep things down to regular post length I'm going to stick it up in a series of bite size chunks. I may add further posts to the series so that I can expand on some of the ideas beyond the word limit that was possible in the article. We'll see if I run out of energy.
I'd love to hear what you think of the proposals.
Preamble
The talk and the article explored what it means to think of the minister as a missionary. My concern was to address the majority of (Baptist) ministers who will devote their lives to serving regular congregations rather than those whose calling takes them into more pioneering ministries such as church planting. Much has been written about the need for such cutting edge ministries in Britain today. I agree wholeheartedly. However, if the church as a whole is to evolve into new missional forms and mentalities it is important that we consider what this might mean for those caring for and reaching out from mainstream congregations, those who for the foreseeable future will continue to comprise the majority of ministers.
The approach that I take is to offer a number of models for how we might envisage the role of the missionary minister. I relate these models to some of the challenges of mission in post-Christian Britain. More of that later though. The first post proper (which will follow soon) is an extended introduction where I explore the idea that mission is best understood not as an activity or a set of activities but as a particular orientation.
I'd love to hear what you think of the proposals.
Preamble
The talk and the article explored what it means to think of the minister as a missionary. My concern was to address the majority of (Baptist) ministers who will devote their lives to serving regular congregations rather than those whose calling takes them into more pioneering ministries such as church planting. Much has been written about the need for such cutting edge ministries in Britain today. I agree wholeheartedly. However, if the church as a whole is to evolve into new missional forms and mentalities it is important that we consider what this might mean for those caring for and reaching out from mainstream congregations, those who for the foreseeable future will continue to comprise the majority of ministers.
The approach that I take is to offer a number of models for how we might envisage the role of the missionary minister. I relate these models to some of the challenges of mission in post-Christian Britain. More of that later though. The first post proper (which will follow soon) is an extended introduction where I explore the idea that mission is best understood not as an activity or a set of activities but as a particular orientation.
Monday, 4 October 2010
Africa United
A friend of mine was producer on this new film. This is me doing my bit to promote it.
The film has been well received on the festival circuit. The Guardian/Observer seemed to like it. All that's needed now is for people to go see it. It's on general release on October 22nd. Here's a trailer.
Wednesday, 29 September 2010
Urban Expression - Manchester Open Day
If you are interested in urban church planting in particular and urban mission/ministry in general it would be great to see at the Urban Experssion Open Day - we kick off in the Asda staff canteen, how can you resist?
Sunday, 26 September 2010
Winter's Bone - Chillingly Good
Once again it's taken a film to kick my bum back into blogging. (The advert that was my last post doesn't really count.) Said film? Winter's Bone (Directed by Debra Granik; starring Jenifer Lawrence) A very good film indeed.
A teenage girl searches for her missing father while caring for her mentally ill mother and her young brother and sister. Dad's due in court and the family house and small holding will be forfeit if he fails to show. There's your narrative mainspring which is wound up just tight enough to move the film along. But it's stuff other than the story that do it for me. This stuff:
A teenage girl searches for her missing father while caring for her mentally ill mother and her young brother and sister. Dad's due in court and the family house and small holding will be forfeit if he fails to show. There's your narrative mainspring which is wound up just tight enough to move the film along. But it's stuff other than the story that do it for me. This stuff:
- It is thoroughly human in ambition and scale. This is a film a bout people.
- It handles its setting, the bleak back-woods of the Ozark Mountains, in way that breathes mood and atmosphere into the story from start to finish. Place matters here; it's Hardyesque.
- It is utterly menacing without being remotely spooky. Menacing but mundane.
- It is concerned with both human evil and human good and skilfully renders both facets of our shared condition.
- It knows that individual human qualities matter, but so do family, community and wider society. Deprivation and neglect grip people and squeeze them into often ugly moulds but personal virtue can still be potent.
- Its heroine, around whom the entire film revolves, is utterly engaging and superbly rendered.
- It has an unexpected centre-piece scene that has a Shakespearian air of horror.
- Its child actors are good enough not to spoil the show.
- It includes what I reckon is the best bit of chain saw action in any film I've seen.
- It knows full well that when it comes to terror, less is more.
Tuesday, 7 September 2010
Tension Mounts As Prophetic Voices Day Conference Draws Near
Re-posting this cos August happened. Bookings coming in steadily. Get yours now.
Advance notice of a tasty-looking day conference. Northern Baptist Learning Community and Luther King House are jointly sponsoring the Northern leg of the Voices From The Margins national tour. Roy Searle and Stuart Murray Williams will lead us as we look at what today's church can learn from the prophetic voices of three radical church groups: Celtic Missionary Monasticism, Anabaptism and the contemporary movement known as New Monasticism. It promises to be a stimulating event. Click here to book.
Advance notice of a tasty-looking day conference. Northern Baptist Learning Community and Luther King House are jointly sponsoring the Northern leg of the Voices From The Margins national tour. Roy Searle and Stuart Murray Williams will lead us as we look at what today's church can learn from the prophetic voices of three radical church groups: Celtic Missionary Monasticism, Anabaptism and the contemporary movement known as New Monasticism. It promises to be a stimulating event. Click here to book.
Labels:
Anabaptism,
Celtic Christianity,
Postchristendom,
Prophecy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



