Jesus seemed to think that evangelism was an important part
of being a disciple. He told Simon and
Andrew that to follow him would mean fishing for people. He told those of his friends who stuck with
him in Jerusalem that when he sent the Holy Spirit they would end up being his
witnesses. According to Matthew, his
parting words make it clear that to be a disciple is to make other
disciples. It all seems pretty
straightforward. If we call ourselves
Christians we are meant to evangelise.
The same is true if we call ourselves Baptists. The official basis of our union only has
three principles, one of those is that every disciple is to bear personal
witness to the good news and take part in the evangelisation of the world.
So, how’s that going?
Ah, thought as much, sorry to hear that.
More and more of us seem to have a problem with
evangelism. On the one hand we know we
are supposed to, but quite frankly much of the evangelism we have seen puts us
off. “If that’s what evangelism looks
like I wouldn’t do it to my worst enemies.” Evangelism can so easily become
intrusive, arrogant, pushy, manipulative, forced, artificial, dishonest - anything
but good news. However, it doesn’t have to be that way.
If you are not a fan of some of the evangelism that you’ve
seen, here’s some good news - not the
good news, but some good news about the good news.
·
You don’t have to stand on street corners shouting
at people.
·
You don’t have to pretend that you want people
to be your friends, just so you can evangelise them.
·
You don’t have to devise a cunning strategy to
get your friends to come to church even though you are pretty sure they don’t
want to.
·
You don’t have to invite them to hear some minor
celebrity who’s pretending to talk about being a celebrity when really that’s
just an excuse to preach the gospel.
·
You don’t have to wear a wrist band and explain
what the heart, the X, the cross and the question mark stand for, or be able to
draw The Bridge to Life, or memorise The Four Spiritual Laws, or any other
formula for that matter.
Those things aren’t what evangelism is. They are just some of
the ways that people have gone about
evangelism.
OK, then, so what is
evangelism?
To put it simply, evangelism is the communication of the
gospel. It’s all about helping people to
find out about and understand the good news of Jesus in the hope that they too will
want to follow him. Evangelism is goodnewsing, getting on with life in
such a way that people have a chance to discover Jesus for themselves.
If I’m right, and this is what
evangelism is, another bit of good
news is that it’s best not to limit evangelism to verbal proclamation.
We can communicate the good news as
individuals or as churches by the way we are,
and the stuff we do as well as the
things we say. Being, doing and speaking are all important
modes of evangelism. When we are the
kind of church that is welcoming, friendly, outward-looking, generous and
forgiving, we communicate the good news by embodying
it. When we work to shelter the
homeless, feed the hungry and campaign for the oppressed, we communicate the
good news by enacting it. When we explain to our friends why we pray,
how we came to follow Jesus or what God means to us, we communicate the good
news by articulating it.
Of course these three modes of
communication work best when they work together. That way they make for a richer expression of
the gospel. Being on its own is too passive.
Doing on its own is too ambiguous. Speaking on its own is too facile. Get it all together though and
our message is more likely to ring true.
The next piece of good news is evangelism
doesn’t always have to be the thing at the front of our mind, the thing we are
consciously aiming at. In fact it often
happens best when it happens obliquely.
Ironically, if evangelism is always the primary motivator for everything
we are, do and say we will end up actually undermining our evangelism because
we will make it inauthentic, twisted, less than genuine.
So, for example, when the way we are
bespeaks Christ, when our churches are hospitable, honouring the least and
including the outsider, this is indeed evangelistic, it communicates the good
news, but our primary intent here is
not to communicate but rather, together as a church, to live a Christ-like
life. Evangelism in this mode is more often than not a blessed by product of
trying to be faithful, Jesus-type communities.
Similarly, if we only ever care for the
needy or work for peace and reconciliation so
that we can let everyone see what the way of Christ looks like, there’s
something about our motivation that is not true to the Jesus we hope to
communicate. Again, gospel communication
in this mode happens best when we are focussed something else, such as loving
people, irrespective of whether or not they are interested in our message.
This also applies when we speak of our faith. When we explain to
friends why we pray, when we offer a Christ-informed perspective to colleagues
at work chatting about an event in the news, even on occasions such as these it
is not that we think, “OK, now I am going to evangelise.” No, we just do it because
part of what it means to live as a Christian is to speak as a Christian and therefor
to speak of Christ.
Now don’t get me wrong here. I’m not against intentional proclamation of
the gospel as one means of communicating good news. There will, of course, always
be those times when our primary purpose is indeed to get the good news across.
But these are evangelism’s special occasions not its everyday way of being.
This is evangelism in its Sunday best not the kind of come as you are and take us as you find us evangelism which is the
staple of ordinary goodnewsing. This
matters, because when we allow disciples to believe that the exceptional is
what defines evangelism we run the risk of putting them off.
Nor am I suggesting that we don’t have
to speak about our faith. I don’t think
St. Francis ever actually said, “Preach the good news and if you must, use
words” but I wish it hadn’t got round that he did. Piping up about Jesus is a crucial part of
evangelism. But it’s a part not the whole. And it’s at its best
when it’s not contrived but rather when we just tell our friends about Jesus,
when we say what we say because that’s who we are, not because we are targeting
someone, seeking to assuage our guilt or trying the get the pastor off our
back.
I don’t know if these thoughts will
help. Some might think I’m watering down
evangelism. In which case I’ve not made
myself clear. I think I’m trying to beef
it up. I’m also trying to help people
see that it can be a commonplace part of ordinary Christian living; something
everyday for everyday disciples; something that everyday disciples just get one
with; something for which the Baptist flavour of disciple becomes known – in
life and not just on paper. If that were
to happen, that would be good news.
This was originally published in the Summer 2016 edition of Baptists Together
2 comments:
Glen, thank you for your wise comments. It's all too easy to get stuck in the binary 'either speak up or shut up' trap. Evangelism must be our lives... An acted-out parable to the good news of Jesus - his influence on our lives, relationships, attitudes, politics,... An act of kindness is as much gospel as a sermon...and perhaps even more so. I find it striking that Peter's defence to the religious authorities in Acts 4:8 is that all he and John were guilty of was an act of kindness.
The only real question I have...and it's one I have struggled with for years...is that in my experience multiple acts of kindness, generosity, compassion have been a blessing to many people but I couldn't necessarily point to many who have become disciples as a result. Don't get me wrong...I think that acts of compression, kindness, etc should be for their own sake...and not for an alterior motive of converting people. But nonetheless...Maybe I can't shake off the notion that I should be able to point to a harvest resulting from my living the values and ethos of the kingdom... I'm also intrigued that those involved in Seventy-Two - the WBA / SWBA (?) venture seeking to encourage mission - speak specifically of 'intentionality' in mission... This (in my mind) seems to be trying to blur the line between doing good as a natural result of living the life of the Kingdom of God and deliberately wanting to do good SO THAT people will become disciples of Jesus.
Thanks again Glen. Much to reflect on...
Thanks for the comment, one quick thought back at yer. Results from acts of kindness alone? I think it is probably impossilbe to trace a demonstrable line of cause and effect when it comes to people becoming disciples. I also think it is important that we weave our gospel tapestries using all three threads: being, doing and saying. Then we get a rich articulation of the good news. The red of our speaking stands out more clearly against the green of our doing. When this happens it's hard to say which aspect of our gospel weaving was responsible for any particular response. I also think that we tend to conceive this in overly indvidualistic terms. What matters most, it seems to me, is the communal evocation of the gospel that we spin through the corporate lives of churches, and even then not just individual congregations but networks of congregations across the country and even (if this is not getting too grand!) throughout our world. We hang our tapestries in our local communities but also display on the frame of society at large. Starting to come over all poetic. Best lie down.
Post a Comment